DIF Knowledge Management System: Bridging Viewpoints for Interactive System Design
نویسندگان
چکیده
Interactive systems have begun to adopt embedded and ubiquitous computing technologies in an attempt to effectively distribute information and functions in our activity space. Because of the pervasive nature of those technologies, it becomes critical to pursue deeper understanding of user needs and consistent incorporation of those needs into the system from a wide range of viewpoints. In order to enhance integration of multiple viewpoints throughout system development, the concept of the Design Information Framework (DIF) was previously introduced as a common information representation platform for interactive system development. This paper reports the development of the DIF Knowledge Management System (DIF-KMS) that provide a common information and tool platform for interdisciplinary collaboration for human-centered interactive system development. The DIF-KMS provides the following functions: 1) defines a set of DILs to establish an evolutionary but consistent ontology of the project, Project DIF (P-DIF), by incorporating different disciplinary viewpoints involved in the development, 2) manages multimedia information resources such as video, photo, sound, graphic, and text documents, 3) encodes data into different representation formats for different viewpoints, 4) translates the encoded data to an aspect model representation by selecting a viewpoint, and 5) composes composite aspect models and other types of representations such as scenarios to integrate information from different views. The DIF-KMS has been implemented as an Internet-based collaboration environment to support development resource sharing among remotely distributed users during interactive system development. Proceedings of 11 Human Computer Interaction International Las Vegas, Nevada USA, July 22-27, 2005
منابع مشابه
-
The development and evolution of any system–person, organization–nation depends on how the system succeeds to bridge the gap between what the system knows and what the system does (with the knowledge). We call this the gap between knowing and doing or the knowing-doing gap. If the system does not do what it knows, it will lose out in competition with other systems, its relative performance in...
متن کاملHow can Diagrammatic Conceptual modelling Support Knowledge Management?
Traditionally, venues that are publishing Knowledge Management research have been separating concerns between two viewpoints that rarely converge into holistic approaches: one is the tradition of Artificial Intelligence research, where "Knowledge Management" is often employed as an umbrella term in relation to a variety of semantic technologies, knowledge representation and knowledge discovery ...
متن کاملBridging the Gap Between Research and Policy and Practice; Comment on “CIHR Health System Impact Fellows: Reflections on ‘Driving Change’ Within the Health System”
Far too often, there is a gap between research and policy and practice. Too much research is undertaken with little relevance to real life problems or its reported in ways that are obscure and impenetrable. At the same time, many policies are developed and implemented but are untouched by, or even contrary to evidence. An accompanying paper describes an innovative progr...
متن کاملSociotechnical System Design for Learning: Bridging the Digital Divide with CompILE
CompILE is a sociotechnical “comprehensive interactive learning environment” system for personal knowledge management and visualization that represents the growing collective knowledge an individual gathers throughout his or her lifespan. A network of intelligent agents connects the user and his or her inhabited knowledge space to external information sources and a multitude of fellow users. Fo...
متن کاملBridging the ‘Two Cultures’ of Research and Service: Can Complexity Theory Help?; Comment on “Experience of Health Leadership in Partnering With University-Based Researchers in Canada – A Call to ‘Re-imagine’ Research”
This commentary addresses Bowen et al’s empirical study of perspectives of Canadian healthcare staff towards research and their call for multi-faceted action to improve misalignments in the system. This commentary argues that tensions and misalignments between research and service are inherent and can never be eradicated. Building on previous work by Lanham et al, I pro...
متن کامل